sure we can modify our application for using smack. we can even modify it for working without XMPP. but i doubt it wont last long. and i think smack is not a small / light weight library. we use smack in our application's server side anyway: a bot which logs into GTalk network
by the way, did you modified smack to use it with android ? can you make your application start with android boot so that incoming messages are not lost even if user did not manually started the application. old GTalk api was making it trivial with intents. r a f t On Nov 2, 1:59 pm, Guillaume Perrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it won't be very long to port your code using the smack > library. > We have used it since M5 because the gtalk API was poor. > Thus, old gtalk api was using Smack. > > On Nov 2, 2:11 am, Steve Oldmeadow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > r a f t wrote: > > > > now i really WONDER if using GTalk service was a hidden judging > > > criteria. i assume at the time of ADC round 1 google had plans to > > > remove GTalk service from api and cannot afford giving prize to an > > > application which wont work on the actual device ! are there any > > > finalist appllications using GTalk service ? > > > No - it was not a hidden judging criteria. Plenty of projects in the > > top ADC 50 were planning on using GTalk they just had to adapt. > > Similarly the removal of video recording, bluetooth APIs, speech > > recognition, javax.sound and I'm sure other things impacted many > > projects. That is life on the bleeding edge. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
