Do you really need a such big array allocated in memory? Maybe you want to save it to file or database? If so, you don't need to create the huge array. Just try to redirect stream.
On 23 Wrz, 17:54, TheSeeker <[email protected]> wrote: > I have reduced lenght of byte to 250 000 (byte[] array = new > byte[250000] instead of char huge char[] array = new char[900000] ) > > I've been trying sending string instead of character by character. if > string is big (250 000 characters aprox and 250 Kbytes) de Garbage > collector go crazy and the time spend is too much (more than 2 min and > it is funny). Then i do other experiment, split the string in a lot of > little string of lenght of 1024 bytes and 256 bytes. The conclusion is > if string is huge the time is infinite and CG produce the spend of > time, and when the string is small 256bytes GC seem to do not produce > the problem. In the extreme case when i send byte by byte (Log posted > above) is the best case > > In the original problem is the best case, because GC spent 1,2 seg(150 > ms*8) aprox but my chronometer in my hand said 15 seg. > > This is rare for me because if i send byte by byte i will be sending a > header of TCP/IP about 40bytes. If i send byte by byte i will be > sending 40*(1Mbytes of info) = 40Mbyes and it work better than send > 1Mbyte in a string > > On Sep 10, 12:53 am, Miguel Morales <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No, breaking it into two arrays will not help you. > > I haven't done this myself, but I THINK what you'll want to do is use > > a BufferedWriter or something similar. In any case, you'll HAVE to > > buffer your data and send it in chunks. HTTP supports this quite > > well. Take a look at some BufferedWriter tutorials, or perhaps > > someone can suggest a better approach. > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:41 PM, TheSeeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > yes, i had a mismach, thanks. But i still have the same problem with > > > time(1 min ) and GC. Create 2 or more array instead of the big one > > > will solve the problem with time? > > > > On Sep 8, 5:47 pm, Frank Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Looks bad, very bad. > > > >> First, I have no idea why you're allocating 1.8 MB (remember that Java, > > >> and > > >> I suppsoe Dalvik as well, takes 16 bits per char). How come so much? > > >> Second, > > >> of course writing a byte (or is it a char, there's a mismatch there) is > > >> going to be slower than writing at least a few thousand at a time. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Android Developers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected] > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > > > -- > > ~ Jeremiah:9:23-24 > > Android 2D > > MMORPG:http://developingthedream.blogspot.com/,http://diastrofunk.com,http:/... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
