zl25drexel wrote: > To me, the apps are the interesting bits but they are not fully > opened. For example, they referenced codes/packages that were close- > sourced or missing (i.e. speech recognition ). Also, as you said, some > apps are completely missing. > > I understand there could be many reasons why they are missing, but I > think i wasnt wrong to call the code base crippled. :)
By that logic, Linux is crippled, since there exist non-open-source applications that run on Linux. I would imagine that there are a fair number of Linux developers who might take umbrage at your definition of "crippled". -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com Android Training on the Ranch! -- Mar 16-20, 2009 http://www.bignerdranch.com/schedule.shtml --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
