Comparing ADT to Visual Studio is a little ridiculous. Using a .Net language like C# in VS to design a GUI is a thing of beauty, but it's gotten to its current point of sophistication after *a lot* of time, money, and engineering effort. This is one of Microsoft's premier products and they've been perfecting it for a long time and do so because it makes them a lot of money.
Considering how long it's been around and the limited resources (I assume, I don't know for sure) that are available for ADT, it's pretty damn good. Honestly, this thread kind of reminds me of the type of whiny users who would leave 1-star ratings for an image editor app because it's not as good as PhotoShop. Most of us have gotten these kinds of "reviews" and it's freaking annoying. Complaining and comparing the tool to VS without even clarifying what the issues are doesn't help anyone. Leave some useful, constructive criticism for the developers. Like I said before, they're on this list and are very responsive. Also, isn't it open-source? So if it's not good enough for you ... well, um ... quit yer bitchin' and contribute to making it as it good as you think it should be, eh? :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TreKing <http://sites.google.com/site/rezmobileapps/treking> - Chicago transit tracking app for Android-powered devices -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
