Sorry if we hurt your feelings, but if you can't take the heat, then this indeed might not be for you.
Outside of that I agree with Disconnect. We all like to think we're done in one step but the reality is a different one. From what I can gather, the Android team has lost the community by remaining silent about the release of 2.0 just to come out one full day in advance of the release of the first devices(s?). This doesn't work as far as the community of independent devs is concerned. Everybody understands that, and some acknowledgment on the part of the Android team would go a long way towards the future. On Oct 27, 9:25 am, Marco Nelissen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and > > the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at > > their practices. > > It's not my job to "support the community", but since I'm obviously > doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. > In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first > message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are "late "because it's a > lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK > releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to > result in faster delivery. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
