I don't, in fact, understand their predicament. I presume they have one. They haven't communicated it, so I won't pretend to understand it.
I'll settle for helping them understand my predicament, and hope they can use that effectively in balancing their predicament. Could you please identify in the document a single threat? And I see statements of need, not demands. I really don't understand your reading of the document. I do take seriously that you have this reaction. It's probably not exactly the way I'd write it, either. But I don't think you're really helping, yet. Even if you don't sign on -- even if it is, in fact, a minority view (I don't think so) - there's value in making clear the sentiment and the problems we face. If there's anything disrespectful, by all means, that needs to change. Maps.Huge.Info (Maps API Guru) wrote: > Regardless, you won't get anywhere with demands, threats and being > angry. You need to work with the Android team not against them. The > best way to do that is be friendly, suggestive and show that you > understand their predicament. > > I, for one, will not support such a document in the current form. > > -John Coryat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
