Two words;  Bluetooth Keyboard.

:)

The bit I like is LG have announces Android plans :) :) :)

Al.


Michael Martin - MM Agency wrote:
> Al,
>
> Looks like an efficient camera centric iPhone - this would capture the
> people who want a full featured camera combined with an Android phone - very
> consumer friendly
>
> I want the keyboard, game playing, music friendly, stylish phone - don't ask
> about getting the needed processing power, memory, and battery efficiency as
> well the cost ;)
>
> Michael Martin
> http://www.googleandblog.com/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [android-discuss] Re: Who else is thinking this...
>
>
> Still too geeky... try 
> http://uk.lge.com/products/model/detail/mobilephones_lgviewty(ku990).jhtml
>
> Key point;  no keyboard.
>
> Al.
>
>
> Michael Martin - MM Agency wrote:
>   
>> Al,
>>
>> You echoed my thoughts and term of "Geek Phone" - now what if the G1 came
>> out looking like this -
>> http://www.googleandblog.com/slick-google-android-phone/3215/
>>
>>
>> ,Michael Martin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:43 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [android-discuss] Re: Who else is thinking this...
>>
>>
>> I'm going down the route of unlocking the G1 so I can use my normal SIM 
>> which I get decent 2G & 3G coverage from.
>>
>> As for mass adoption, I think the problem is not simply cost. The 
>> T-Mobile shop I visited is in a town of 75,000 people and is the 
>> commercial hub for a number of surrounding towns and villages. It has a 
>> number of web design agencies based there as well as "Internet 
>> consultancies" and a couple of small ISPs. The next nearest T-Mobile 
>> shop is 8 miles away and when I visited them at around mid-day today 
>> (launch day here) I was the second person who had shown an interest in 
>> buying a G1. Talking to the in-store staff the main issues seemed to be 
>> lack of headphone socket, poor camera, and form-factor.
>>
>> The impression I got was that it looked too "Businessy" for the people 
>> after a personal 'phone, yet it's not got the Business functionality 
>> that corporates want (Exchange intgration, no PDF reader, etc.).
>>
>> I guess it may just be a geek-phone :).
>>
>> Al.
>>
>> P.S. I still laugh when I see that T-Mobile UK offer the user guide from 
>> their website as a PDF and, of course, you can't read it on a G1.
>>
>> Mogees wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I certainly understand where you're coming from in terms of you not
>>> getting the 3G coverage and also being forced to pay for more minutes
>>> than you need. On the point about the G1 not gaining mass adoption,
>>> here's some news that may point to the contrary. Walmart is going to
>>> start selling G1's for $149 in the US, which I think will make it a
>>> very popular mass market gift in the US for this holiday season.
>>>
>>> http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/wal-mart-sell-g1-149/2008-10-28
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2:44 am, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> I've recently decided not to buy a G1 when they launch in the UK (where
>>>> I live) for a number of reasons, I'm wondering who else has thought it
>>>> through and come to a similar conclusion?
>>>>
>>>> Al.
>>>>
>>>> P.S. For anyone who is interested I've put my reasons in my blog
>>>>       
>>>>         
>> athttp://alsutton.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/why-i-wont-be-buying-the-and...
>>   
>>     
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>   


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to