..to clarify, I didn't put it there. I was just thinking "thats a bad
place.. I wonder what would be clearer."

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Disconnect <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yah, I agree its kind of in a bad place. But I couldn't think of anywhere
> else to put it, since it basically covers apps that are free -in the
> market-.
>
> Maybe in it's own block..
>
> Either way, the googs say its been forced on them by the carrier(s) as a
> requirement for shipping market on the phones (and that the 'tax' taken off
> - 40% iirc - is not kept by goog) .. how true that is, meh. I dunno. I know
> they have little reason to lie, but..
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Blimey, I missed that one tacked on the end of 3.3.
>>
>> Seems totally contradictory to say "In order to charge a fee for your
>> Products, you must have a valid Payment Account under a separate
>> agreement with a Payment Processor.", and then two clauses later say
>> "All fees received by Developers for Products distributed via the Market
>> must be processed by the Market's Payment Processor".
>>
>> That bit of 3.3 would mean that any pay-for app you distribute via
>> Market can not be distributed by any other means or integrated into any
>> other payment system (otherwise you would be receiving some fees for a
>> product distributed via the Market by the processing of a non-Market
>> payment processor), which is distinctly not good and totally messes up
>> the business model of app directories handling app payments.
>>
>> Thankfully Market is closed source which means that some of the porting
>> groups have been looking at alternatives, so you'll be seeing the
>> AndAppStore client on some Android devices in the near future and
>> developers can leverage it to retain the choice of payment processor.
>>
>> Al.
>>
>> Disconnect wrote:
>> > 3.3 ..You may not collect future charges from users for copies of the
>> > Products that those users were initially allowed to download for free.
>> > .. However, if you want to collect fees after the free trial expires,
>> > you must collect all fees for the full version of the Product through
>> > the Payment Processor on the Market. ... All fees received by
>> > Developers for Products distributed via the Market must be processed
>> > by the Market's Payment Processor.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thou shalt not use the market to distribute an app, and then collect
>> > money somewhere else.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >     Can you point out exactly where the Market T&Cs say you have to go
>> >     through Markets payment processor?
>> >
>> >     Using a non-Marketplace payment processor isn't listed as
>> unacceptable
>> >     in either the "Market Developer Content Policies"
>> >     (
>> http://market.android.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=113474&topic=15866
>> >     <
>> http://market.android.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=113474&topic=15866
>> >)
>> >     or the "ANDROID MARKET CONTENT POLICY FOR DEVELOPERS"
>> >     (http://www.android.com/market/terms/developer-content-policy.html
>> ),
>> >     in
>> >     fact neither of these documents even contain the words pay,
>> >     payment, or
>> >     paid.
>> >
>> >     The Market Developer distribution agreement at
>> >     http://www.android.com/us/developer-distribution-agreement.html
>> >     says in 3.1;
>> >
>> >     "In order to charge a fee for your Products, you must have a valid
>> >     Payment Account under a separate agreement with a Payment
>> >     Processor. If
>> >     you already have a Payment Account with a Payment Processor before
>> >     signing up for the Market, then the terms of this Agreement shall
>> >     supersede your Payment Account terms and condition for Products
>> >     sold via
>> >     the Market."
>> >
>> >     which seems to contradict what you say by talking about generic
>> >     Payment
>> >     Processors with which the developer has an agreement with before
>> even
>> >     signing up to Market.
>> >
>> >     As for it being a misleading the OP was making the point that paid
>> >     apps
>> >     increase the quality of availability, and I was pointing out that
>> paid
>> >     apps are already a possibility but the companies trying to roll
>> >     them out
>> >     are being actively undermined by Googles removal of apps using
>> >     them from
>> >     the Market. I understand the world of commercial reasons for it, but
>> >     Market was described as "an open service hosted by Google that
>> >     features
>> >     a feedback and rating system similar to YouTube" in the Android
>> >     Developers blog
>> >     (
>> http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/08/android-market-user-driven-content.html
>> ),
>> >     so imagine of YouTube started taking down videos of bands just
>> because
>> >     they put up "Buy our album at www.????? in a strap line".
>> >
>> >     Al.
>> >
>> >     Disconnect wrote:
>> >     > The market ToS require all payments for apps downloaded from the
>> >     > market to go through the market. So "here is a free trial" is only
>> >     > acceptable when followed by "..there is no full version yet" or
>> "the
>> >     > full version is available in the market".  There are quite a few
>> >     list
>> >     > threads related to that and the google people have been very
>> >     > forthcoming about the reasoning and problems they have had with
>> >     > carrier acceptance, etc.
>> >     >
>> >     > Google has also been very clear that payment is going to be an
>> >     option
>> >     > in first quarter, hopefully as early as mid January.
>> >     >
>> >     > It is somewhat misleading to leave that fact out when answering..
>> >     >
>> >     > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >     Developers can currently distribute pay-for apps through one
>> >     of the
>> >     >     Market alternatives (AndAppStore, SlideMe, etc.), and pay-for
>> >     >     functionality is available for integration in any app via
>> >     systems such
>> >     >     as Mogees.
>> >     >
>> >     >     The problem at the moment is that Google seem to be actively
>> >     removing
>> >     >     apps from Market which have a pay-for option, so you may want
>> to
>> >     >     try one
>> >     >     of the alternatives and help support those developers who are
>> >     >     trying to
>> >     >     make a go of Android development pay-for apps by going to
>> >     one of the
>> >     >     alternatives and seeing if there is something you like.
>> >     >
>> >     >     Al.
>> >     >     http://andappstore.com/
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >     j wrote:
>> >     >     > Is there any info on when paid apps will be supported on
>> >     Market?  I
>> >     >     > heard it would be in 2009 but which month?
>> >     >     >
>> >     >     > Once that happens, we will see much higher quality apps on
>> >     >     Market.  I
>> >     >     > can't wait!
>> >     >     > >
>> >     >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >     --
>> >     >     ======
>> >     >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with
>> the
>> >     >     company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp
>> >     House,
>> >     >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>> >     >
>> >     >     The views expressed in this email are those of the author
>> >     and not
>> >     >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates,
>> >     or it's
>> >     >     subsidiaries.
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     > >
>> >
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     ======
>> >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
>> >     company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
>> >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>> >
>> >     The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
>> >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
>> >     subsidiaries.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>>
>>
>> --
>> ======
>> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
>> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
>> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>>
>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
>> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
>> subsidiaries.
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to