Fred Grott wrote: > My Bias is wikidot since I already use it and familiar with it.. > > I think we would get more benefits now by moving ahead.. > > If wikidot hosting via Mark Murphy is chosen is there anything fROm us > that you might need Mark?
A vote of confidence would be cool. After that, contributed content. Lots and lots of contributed content. Followed by inbound links to the wiki. Lots and lots of inbound links. ;-) In all seriousness, I don't want to put up a wiki that's a ghost town. That's part of the reason I haven't done it yet. Beyond that, it could use some consensus on a couple of points: -- License: CC-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 is recommended by Wikidot, and that seems OK, but I'd like to not change the license once it's up. -- Permissions: Can anonymous cowards edit? Or do we require registration? Or do we require they become "site members"? I'm not sure which will give us the most wheat with the least chaff. Also, I really really really really would like to hear from somebody on the core Android team (publicly or privately) with their thoughts. As I wrote to somebody else this morning, what I don't want to do is waste a bunch of time trying to set something up, only to be Bambi right away to Google/OHA's Godzilla: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAVYYe87b9w Thoughts? -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com Android Training in Sweden -- http://www.sotrium.com/training.php --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to android-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
