Understood,..just keeping  track to see what can be integrated and what
cannot as of now for my Zyke HomeScreen app



On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Now, of course, the exact current implementation could also stay in,
> with the API getting removed from the SDK at the last minute (e.g. if
> the implementation is good enough for the build-in widgets which come
> from "trusted" apps but would cause some stability issues with
> 3rd-party apps).
>
> Those things happen, and they often do at the last minute.
>
> JBQ
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Fred Grott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks that does help :)
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I can't be 100% sure, but as far as I understand it'd take quite some
> >> effort to "undo" that change.
> >>
> >> JBQ
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Fred Grott <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Is appwidget APi stable enough to be in?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, the official roadmap only says "IMF/IME" and that's in.
> >> >>
> >> >> JBQ
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Care to share any details about any of the features from the
> original
> >> >> > roadmap which won't make the cut :)?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Al.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >
> >> >> > * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ======
> >> >> > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> >> >> > company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> >> >> > 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> >> >> > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or
> it's
> >> >> > subsidiaries.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: [email protected]
> >> >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Jean-Baptiste
> >> >> > Queru
> >> >> > Sent: 06 April 2009 04:07
> >> >> > To: [email protected]
> >> >> > Subject: [android-discuss] Re: Looks like cupcakes on the 1st of
> >> >> > May...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cupcake is a development source tree, and not every feature that
> has
> >> >> > been
> >> >> > worked on in that tree will reach a shippable quality for a
> >> >> > cupcake-originated release: some of those will be kept hidden until
> >> >> > they
> >> >> > get
> >> >> > good enough to ship in a future release.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > JBQ
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Eric Wong (hdmp4.com)
> >> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Yes ther Sdk version that wil be released wil have some Cupcake
> >> >> > features..
> >> >> >>> but it s not the full  Cupcake SDk..
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Doesn't sound like a good news to me.
> >> >> >> Why is it not the full cupcake? (so we only get a bite and not the
> >> >> >> whole cake, ah?)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> >> Eric
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >> > Android Engineer, Google.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >> > will
> >> >> > likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> >> > warning.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >> Android Engineer, Google.
> >> >>
> >> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> >> >> warning.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> Android Engineer, Google.
> >>
> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> warning.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to