On Apr 9, 7:52 am, mike quinn <[email protected]> wrote:
> You say it is unlikely that an independent developer will invest
> time/money/resource to make their application "look" professional and
> provide unique selling points, hell mend them then.
No I am saying they will pack for greener grass. iPhone, Symbian, you
name it.
>
> Just because someone got there first doesn't mean that any other developer
> (Google included) should not be able to produce the same application that a)
> Looks better and/or b)provides additional killer features.
Sure, in an ideal world, there is always a better app around the
corner. This is a paper tiger however and you prove the point that the
paper tiger screams the loudest. Reality check! It takes substantial
effort to put something compelling together and - speaking for myself
here - I do not feel inspired to put the effort forward as long as
there's the Google brand looming. This is how MS Explorer kill
Netscape.
All things considered, I rather find something else to do with my
time.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
