I think that the Android OS and its apps should be better equipped to run on devices that are resource constrained, be that little screens, little memory or a slow processor.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:43 PM, lbcoder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On top of that, you have the added benefit that running on an ARM > processor will prevent the user from installing that crap. This can go > a LONG way in beating down the monopoly and providing people with > actual FREEDOM. > > > On Apr 27, 9:34 am, lbcoder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because despite the unsuitability of android for such devices, > > ANYTHING is better than microshaft. > > > > On Apr 27, 9:10 am, Incognito <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You can get a dell laptop with windows for $250. Why get android? > > > > > On Apr 27, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Pd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Apologies if you've already seen this > > > > >http://www.infoworld.com/d/hardware/first-android-netbook-cost-about-. > .. > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
