> ".. updated versions of applications entered in the ADC 1 contest are > ineligible for ADC 2."
I also think this rule needs careful explanation. What is an updated version, and what is a new application? Is it sufficient to change the name, icon, look, and add a few new features? If not, what if a competitor wrote an application that was similar, but had different name, icon, look and a few new features? Would that be a brand new application? Technically, the minimum requirements on Android to have a "new" application is to have a new and unique package name (because then no update of previously installed software is possible). Is this the only requirement that is meant? Peli www.openintents.org On May 28, 2:10 am, Spencer Riddering <[email protected]> wrote: > ".. updated versions of applications entered in the ADC 1 contest are > ineligible for ADC 2." > > I can't tell you how disappointed I am to read this. I've spent the > past year preparing for ADC 2. I've rewritten my ADC 1 entry at least > once since ADC 1 but the name and overall concepts behind my > application are the same. I've also significantly enhanced the the > features and usability. I've been careful not to publish my > application. > > When Dan Morrill said "I also hope that the developers of the other > great apps that didn't receive prizes will consider the second Android > Developer Challenge, which should begin later this year." I thought > this implied that ADC 1 entries would be fair game for ADC 2. > Apparently I was wrong. > > Spencer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
