Thanks for the reply! Peli
On Jul 17, 4:18 pm, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > If you (or your firm) are a partner or affiliate with anybody, you'll > find an agreement that establishes that relationship, i.e. you enter a > "Partnering Agreement". I suspect this is not the case, and you rather > have an agreement to provide products and services. The OTA member > then is your client or customer. In this case, you're not a partner, > let alone an affiliate. > > On Jul 17, 6:23 am, Peli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a related question regarding the definition of > > "affiliate" (since this can be translated in various ways): > > > If someone writes and sells an application to one of the OHA members > > (for example, one of the telephone companies), then they could be > > partners on a project level, but that would not make them "affiliate" > > of the OHA member in the legal commercial sense, right? > > > Or if an OHA member or Google uses a third party product for > > advertisement (for example being featured on Market, or displayed in a > > leaflet of a new phone as possible third party app), this would also > > not make that third party automatically an affiliate of the OHA > > member, right? (even less if the third party has not received any > > compensation except for the advertisement itself). > > > Or if someone helps to organize an event or gives a presentation at an > > event that is being sponsored amongst others by an OHA member, that > > would also not make them automatically be an affiliate of the OHA > > member, right? > > > So one could in principle sell software to one of the OHA members and > > partner with them, or have ones software be displayed on websites of > > OHA members or Google, and still be eligible to participate in ADC 2. > > Is this correct? > > > Peli > > > On Jul 14, 8:05 pm, "David M." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes. Both ARM and TI are members of the OHA. Thus, employees of ARM > > > and TI are not eligible to participate in the Challenge. > > > -David > > > > On Jul 14, 12:09 am, ssj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > I was wondering if anyone could help me understand this clause: > > > > Employees of (i) Google, (ii) members of the Open Handset Alliance, > > > > (iii) the parent companies, affiliates and subsidiaries of either > > > > Google or any member of the Open Handset Alliance... are not eligible > > > > to participate in the Challenge. > > > > > For (ii) and (iii) does that mean if someone is an employee of ARM or > > > > TI for example, would they be automatically disqualified? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
