I just received an email this morning from androidplayground.net and thought I'd share it with you all. Gotta love how blatant this asshole is. Efforts are in the works for taking this site down as well, they just don't know it yet.
I do wonder why their logo is an android wearing an eyepatch and a peg leg, sorta like a pirate? Hmmm I seem to be oblivious as to what that is alluding to. ------------------------------------------------------- Hi, We don't have any applications on our site. That's probably why Google and our host won't shut us down. Plus there is no proof that we distribute anything. As many people there are on the market posting " I have apps!" You come at me...also whatever "file host" you are contacting is probably looking at you as an idiot since we don't use one.(no files on site). Why would they even come after I site like mine when there are hundreds of torrent site distributing movies,games,applications, etc.. when I deal with .99c apps? We charge for membership, not applications. Have a good day! ------------------------------------------------------- And here is the email header information . Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.114.123.6 with SMTP id v6cs22459wac; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.89.22 with SMTP id m22mr6515800ybb. 294.1254586952581; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail-gx0-f217.google.com (mail-gx0-f217.google.com [209.85.217.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 15si2679283ywh. 69.2009.10.03.09.22.32; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.217.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=209.85.217.217; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.217.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected] Received: by mail-gx0-f217.google.com with SMTP id 9so2475863gxk.15 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.146.33 with SMTP id y33mr3970755ann. 194.1254586952163; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from localhost (m1e5e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.94.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1530354yxe. 7.2009.10.03.09.22.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Android From: Tech Support <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:19:37 -0400 To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- DWN6FLATS1LX9PBRW3Y1WOSYKQ8LCM" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------DWN6FLATS1LX9PBRW3Y1WOSYKQ8LCM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksCldlIGRvbid0IGhhdmUgYW55IGFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBvbiBvdXIgc2l0ZS4gVGhhdCdzIHBy b2JhYmx5IHdoeSBHb29nbGUgYW5kIG91ciBob3N0IHdvbid0IHNodXQgdXMgZG93bi4gUGx1cyB0 aGVyZSBpcyBubyBwcm9vZiB0aGF0IHdlIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGUgYW55dGhpbmcuIEFzIG1hbnkgcGVv cGxlIHRoZXJlIGFyZSBvbiB0aGUgbWFya2V0IHBvc3RpbmcgIiBJIGhhdmUgYXBwcyEiIFlvdSBj b21lIGF0IG1lLi4uYWxzbyB3aGF0ZXZlciAiZmlsZSBob3N0IiB5b3UgYXJlIGNvbnRhY3Rpbmcg aXMgcHJvYmFibHkgbG9va2luZyBhdCB5b3UgYXMgYW4gaWRpb3Qgc2luY2Ugd2UgZG9uJ3QgdXNl IG9uZS4obm8gZmlsZXMgb24gc2l0ZSkuIFdoeSB3b3VsZCB0aGV5IGV2ZW4gY29tZSBhZnRlciBJ IHNpdGUgbGlrZSBtaW5lIHdoZW4gdGhlcmUgYXJlIGh1bmRyZWRzIG9mIHRvcnJlbnQgc2l0ZSBk aXN0cmlidXRpbmcgbW92aWVzLGdhbWVzLGFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucywgZXRjLi4gd2hlbiBJIGRlYWwg d2l0aCAuOTljIGFwcHM/ IFdlIGNoYXJnZSBmb3IgbWVtYmVyc2hpcCwgbm90IGFwcGxpY2F0aW9u cy4KSGF2ZSBhIGdvb2QgZGF5IQ== ------DWN6FLATS1LX9PBRW3Y1WOSYKQ8LCM-- On Oct 2, 9:15 am, Fred Grott <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I agree we should continue to do this type of effort.. > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM, L!TH!UM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Looks like karma has done her job! So, anyone care to mention whether > > they complained to the webhost? I personally wrote a nice letter and > > provided links to offending material of mine. > > > I'm not sure if the discussions here helped any, but I think we should > > continue posts such as this and even provide the whois info for all to > > see. > > > On Oct 2, 7:52 am, Shane Isbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Looks as though android-leak is now offline. Lots of people on twitter > > > aren't happy. > > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Fred Grott <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Better yet have Google Legal department cal him just for fun :) > > > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:12 PM, L!TH!UM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> On Sep 28, 2:49 pm, Fred Grott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > Better yet file a DCMA request and watch his horror when the ISP > > cuts > > > >> him > > > >> > off :) > > > > >> That's only fun if we can be there to watch. Perhaps its time to use > > > >> up some of my spare minutes and have a chat with Nick. Perhaps a nice > > > >> prank call to scare the shit out of him would due nicely, guess it's > > > >> time to test out the recording feature of GoogleVoice. > > > > >> I'd go the DMCA route, but all of my apps are currently free, but I > > > >> still feel your pain. > > > > -- > > > Shane Isbell (Co-founder of SlideME - The Original Market for Android) > >http://twitter.com/sisbellhttp://twitter.com/slideme-Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
