On 05/30/2011 02:15 PM, Technogasms wrote:
The main patent at issue is U.S. Patent #7,222,078.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7222078.PN.&OS=PN/7222078&RS=PN/7222078
On May 30, 1:45 pm, Chris Lang<[email protected]> wrote:
Does anyone have a link to the original patent? I want to see the
documentation and run it past my lawyer before I make any decisions or
comment on this. And really in my mind, that is the only one that matters,
what my contract lawyer advises me to do. So my advice is do the same, seek
legal advice on legal matters from a lawyer. Cheap too....
Chris Lang
CEO at Gadget MVP
Talk about broad and obfuscated language:
"In an exemplary system, information is received at a central location
from different units of a commodity. The information is generated from
two-way local interactions between users of the different units of the
commodity and a user interface in the different units of the commodity.
The interactions elicit from respective users their perceptions of the
commodity. " :-D
This patent should be rescinded and maybe Apple, Google and others can
make it so. "Commodity" is a rather abstruse term and seems like the
patent attorney had a hard time figuring out what word to use.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android
Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
