Almost sure that if they were to patent for a time machine or perpetual motion 
machine they would get ot.

On Jun 1, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Brian Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:

> I bothered to read though the patent quite a bit and though I'm not a lawyer 
> I was struck by the language as if they never really developed anything but 
> instead came up with a concept that they thought someone else might try to 
> implement in the future.  Time has probably come unless you want innovation 
> to come to a halt to do a complete overhaul of the patent system.
> 
> On 06/01/2011 11:41 AM, Felipemnoa wrote:
>> Lodsys strategy may be to cause a lot of pain to google by going after the 
>> developers. If a lot of developers start to complain they pribably think 
>> that that may speed up negotiations in their favor. The real problem here is 
>> that the patent was granted in the first place.
>> 
>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Tim Mensch<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> 
>>> On 6/1/2011 2:48 AM, Craig White wrote:
>>>> Their licensing fees were
>>>       purposely set low to
>>> 
>>>       >  Apple and Google because those companies pay patent lawyers
>>>       already
>>> 
>>>       >  so there's no incentive for Lodsys to get into a protracted
>>>       legal
>>> 
>>>       >  battle that might invalidate their patent.
>>> 
>>> They didn't license the patents to Google and Apple. That was done before 
>>> LodSys acquired the patents in question as part of a block of (IIRC) 30,000 
>>> patents, and the only question is whether the license that Google and Apple 
>>> own cover the usage of the technology in question in externally developed 
>>> applications.
>>> 
>>> They actually ARE trying to squeeze more money from Apple and Google. In 
>>> the press release about their lawsuits against developers they mention 
>>> being "surprised" that Apple mentioned their secret negotiations publicly.
>>> 
>>>> US patent law sucks -
>>>       especially when it comes to software patents.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> That much is certain.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Android Discuss" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Android Discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to