harwey wrote: Hi Wouter,
Quote: does this mean that cartridges running on a 3.0 core would have a version number 3.0.x ? (end of quote) I would definitely vote for this rule. There would not be any space for missunderstandings concerning version conflicts - simple and easy. Cheers Harald (end of quote) Me too, I would follow this rule... The main thing: all cartridges 3.x.x should work on core 3.x.x. I could imagine that the release of cartridges would be faster than core, since core needs to be stable... Could be something like: Core: APIs and metafacades Core x.x.[x] -> [x]: bug removals Core x.[x].x -> [x]: new minor features, deprecated APIs Core [x].x.x -> [x]: new major features, cleaning APIs, no backward compatibility Cheers, Lofi. _________________________________________________________ Reply to the post : http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=776#776 Posting to http://forum.andromda.org/ is preferred over posting to the mailing list! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Andromda-user mailing list Andromda-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
