sorry, i mean the most *concise *one. 在 2014年6月3日星期二UTC+8下午9时03分36秒，焦晓冬写道： > > As expected by large-scale programmers, especially in nowadays web app > time. > > Functional programming makes life easy when it first faces to simple web > font-end programming, and becomes hard when facing complex apps. Pure > functional programming masks code hard to read by others.So, various ways > to simulate OO behaviors are used widely, in jQuery, even in Angular > itself. And things make OO programming easy is not saying to abandon > functional programming. Instead, it's a supplement to functional > programming. Those together make code simple and at the same time easy to > read and maintain. And classjs is really the most consice one as far as i > know. > > 在 2014年6月3日星期二UTC+8下午5时34分04秒，mark prades写道： >> >> But the code itself is not intuitively object-oriented as expected >> >> >> As expected by whom? >> >> classjs is pure cargo culting. learn functional programming patterns and >> you'll understand AngularJS code. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
