在 2014年6月4日星期三UTC+8上午3时03分33秒，Sander Elias写道： > Hi Leo, > > > Hmm, of all the source in AngularJS, you pick the part that's build like this > to be able to be compatible with jquery (which is build pretty much similar > to jqLite). > And yes, I did look into the JQ code a long time ago, so there were no > surprises like that for me. > How is this proof that OO is better as a paradigm than any other way? It's > hardly an independant study is it? > What are the facts you are telling me? That complex constructor functions are > bad? You don't have those when you go fully OO? > I would say no and no ;) > > > ES6 is adding it, because it is giving in to the pressure of people like you. > They grew tired of the nagging. Don't believe me? go read all the blogs and > writings the ES6 guys do. You will see they think it isn't a particularly > good idea, but it is asked for so much, and they are tired fighting it. > > > To cut a long story short, can you come up with an independant study that > proves with researched facts that OO is better than all other ways? > Until that, you are following a belief. That's your choice, but do not try to > force it upon me, or upon really well written systems like angular. > > > Regards > Sander >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
