Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Right. But to be very clear, at the moment the M_FLOOD syntax is

    >  flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl, (locator-option
    > / []), +objective]

    > but to associate a locator with each objective it would need to be

    >  flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl,
    > +[(locator-option / []), objective]]

    > That would be more powerful for the case you describe. Since the
    > locator option could be a URI, it would suit EST quite well, wouldn't
    > it?

yes-ish, but really, the proxy is in charge of where the Registrar is.
In a pure-ANIMA scenario, we don't use an EST URI.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to