Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25/11/2016 18:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>
>> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Right. But to
>> be very clear, at the moment the M_FLOOD syntax is
>>
>> > flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl,
>> (locator-option > / []), +objective]
>>
>> > but to associate a locator with each objective it would need to be
>>
>> > flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl, >
>> +[(locator-option / []), objective]]
>>
>> > That would be more powerful for the case you describe. Since the >
>> locator option could be a URI, it would suit EST quite well, wouldn't
>> > it?
>>
>> yes-ish, but really, the proxy is in charge of where the Registrar is.
>> In a pure-ANIMA scenario, we don't use an EST URI.
>>
> Ack. In any case, do you think we should make this change? It's now or
> never.
I will propose something by Monday...
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
