On 25/11/2016 18:30, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right. But to be very clear, at the moment the M_FLOOD syntax is > > > flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl, (locator-option > > / []), +objective] > > > but to associate a locator with each objective it would need to be > > > flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl, > > +[(locator-option / []), objective]] > > > That would be more powerful for the case you describe. Since the > > locator option could be a URI, it would suit EST quite well, wouldn't > > it? > > yes-ish, but really, the proxy is in charge of where the Registrar is. > In a pure-ANIMA scenario, we don't use an EST URI. >
Ack. In any case, do you think we should make this change? It's now or never. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
