Apart from me and Michael, who else wants to work on code and run
it in Chicago on March 25 and 26? We need BRSKI, ACP and GRASP.

Regards
   Brian

On 30/12/2016 14:19, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian and I have been discussing thoughts about an ANIMA Hackathon at IETF94.
> 
> The question has been: how much code would be ready, and how much
> interoperation could be actually attempt!
> 
> In my mind the first bakeoff/hackathon will likely be a bit underwhelming
> because people won't have enough code yet.  That's okay: the point is to
> invite people to come and consider how they are going to do things.
> i.e. this is as much marketing is it is interoperation, but it's
>      marketing to get participation in the future!!!!
> 
> We can't plan just the one hackathon.
> 
> From my point of view, I see the several stages/actors of bootstrap.
> I'm listing them because they can be mock'ed if someone has no code for this.
> 
> 1) registrar.
> 2) network of ACP nodes running GRASP, of which one is a willing proxy.
> 3) new pledge
> 4) vendor / manufacturer CA
> 
> I have some (RubyOnRails) code that can operate as a bit of a registrar, and
> I'll have more by March that can do more EST things, but the code I have now
> can be used to manually generate certificates.  So, ANIMA systems that
> don't have bootstrap code could be manually bootstrapped, and we likely will
> learn something doing that.
> 
> The network of ACP nodes running GRASP, at least on Linux, is "trivial" to
> setup in a mock situation.
> 
> At least, it's easy for me to do, and I would very much be happy to share
> that experience, so you'd have "installed ACP code".
> 
> Could we find someone with enough Microsoft Windows IPsec clue to set up
> tunnel on Windows, and figure out how to get the right certificates loaded?
> I dunno... maybe someone here knows how.  Also Cisco, Juniper, Ericsson, etc
> routers might be manually configured to do ACP tunnels; and we likely learn
> something trying to make things interoperate.
> 
> So even if we couldn't get RPL to operate across a multi-platform situation,
> we might still be able to, for instance, M_FLOOD something across a bunch of
> IPsec P2P tunnels connecting things.  That would be a significant
> accomplishment in my mind for a first attempt.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> 

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to