Owen Friel (ofriel) <[email protected]> wrote: > [ofriel] I think a more comprehensive analysis of the various SSID > discover options (DPP, hardcoded SSID, NAI Realm,..) and how each fits > into the two post-SSID discovery options of (i) a new EAP-BRSKI > vs. (ii) reuse of EAP-TLS (or some suitable EAP method, possibly with > 2x 80.1x exchanges) is needed before any consensus on the contents of > an ID is necessary. Unless you are suggesting than an initial ID merely > outlines the multiple options but makes no final recommendation > yet. Happy to get started on that...
Yes... the point of the ID would be to layout the options.... The options-not-selected would go into an appendix of a final document to explain paths not taken. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
