Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
    > 1) In Section 5:

    >    o In the language of [RFC6125] this provides for a SERIALNUM-ID
    > category of identifier that can be included in a certificate and
    > therefore that can also be used for matching purposes.  The
    > SERIALNUM-ID whitelist is collated according to manufacturer trust
    > anchor since serial numbers are not globally unique.

    > I think now you are just inventing things. Please define what exactly
    > SERIALNUM-ID is. Cut & paste text from RFC 6125, if needed.

https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/commit/2f4cee70fc583c60a4589c983043a346ac0145ea

new text reads:
        This extends the informal set of "identifer type" values defined in
        <xref target="RFC6125" /> to include a SERIALNUM-ID
        category of identifier that can be
        included in a certificate and
        therefore that can also be used for matching
        purposes. As noted
        in that document this is not a formal definition as
        the underlying
        types have been previously defined elsewhere. The
        SERIALNUM-ID whitelist is collated
        according to manufacturer
        trust anchor since serial numbers are not globally
        unique.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to