Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: >> The advice we got from the .well-known expert was that we should have >> this document Updates: RFC7030, and that the /est entry in the >> registry should say "RFC7030, RFCXXXX". Will this be enough rather >> than create a new registry? We think that no other /.well-known has a >> registry. >> >> Tell us which way to go.
> I think the answer depends on whether you want to have an easy way of
> finding second level URI path components under "est". I personally
> prefer a new registry, but I understand that it might be a bit more
> work in the document.
I prefer Updates: 7030.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
