Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> >> But, that's why we have SHOULD, and the SHOULD (vs MUST) part was
>> really to >> allow for some fancy HTTP/3 we know nothing about :-)
>>
>> > :)
>>
>> > Do we still want to say "HTTP 1.1 persistent connections" vs. "HTTP
>> > persistent connections", though?
>>
>> I am using the latter now.
> Please double-check; I think I saw one in the -28 (but didn't make a
> note of where).
I found a second instance of 1.1, and removed it.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
