Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But, that's why we have SHOULD, and the SHOULD (vs MUST) part was >> really to >> allow for some fancy HTTP/3 we know nothing about :-) >> >> > :) >> >> > Do we still want to say "HTTP 1.1 persistent connections" vs. "HTTP >> > persistent connections", though? >> >> I am using the latter now.
> Please double-check; I think I saw one in the -28 (but didn't make a
> note of where).
I found a second instance of 1.1, and removed it.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
