Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
>> I'm not 100% sure if for a resource at the root (/), one Uri-Path
>> Option with 0 length is needed or if 0 Uri-Path Options can be used.
>> Or if both methods would be valid.
> That is a well-known idiosyncracy in the URI format.
> Have a look at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7252#section-6.4
> Step 8 treats coap://foo and coap://foo/ in the same way:
> If the value of the <path> component of |url| is empty or
> consists of a single slash character (U+002F SOLIDUS "/"), then move to
> the next step.
So, no Uri-Path option is equivalent to /?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
