Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
> As you said also the following would be possible today:
> application/voucher+ysid
> if we register 'ysid' as being CBOR-YANG-SID that's included in a COSE
> wrapper. I find this less useful than the first options of '+cbor' or
> '+cose' , it seems too specific.
I'm agnositc because:
1) over COAP it's a single CONTENT-FORMAT, so the size does not matter.
2) over HTTPS, it's a rich network environment, so bytes do not count.
We've been told at this point that we should use as specific a format as
possible. I don't think that voucher+ysig is meaningful (or accurate) for
us, because we also COSE sign it, which not every YANG-SID use will do.
So I just don't know what to do, but I think we what have done is wrong.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
