Esko Dijk <esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
>> So I just don't know what to do, but I think we what have done is
>> wrong.
> What we have now is "application/voucher-cose+cbor", which is not wrong
> I think. There's currently no rule saying your media type needs to be
It's not wrong, but it's not sufficiently right :-)
> named in a particular way, there are options to name it. In this same
> discussion thread (or parallel thread with same subject) we have
> discussed that "application/voucher+cose" would also be a good name, if
> we register the "+cose" suffix with IANA.
My reading is that we can have +cose for the cost of an Expert Review.
application/cose is already registered.
My next message is about that.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
