Hi Steffen, > On Sep 5, 2024, at 8:42 AM, Fries, Steffen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Murray, > > Thank you for the review and the comments. I included a resolution proposal > below. > > Best regards > Steffen > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 9:33 AM >> To: The IESG <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-12: >> (with >> COMMENT) >> >> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-12: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email >> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory >> paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >> https://www.ietf.or/ >> g%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot- >> positions%2F&data=05%7C02%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7C629ef6d8d7e >> 94c8c850908dccd7cf50f%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7 >> C638611183825145483%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMD >> AiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sd >> ata=h9kBDHQanmWGZp4d2UjDY9z84yjMEvLDTqpZLELucrc%3D&reserved=0 >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker/. >> ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-anima-brski- >> ae%2F&data=05%7C02%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7C629ef6d8d7e94c8c >> 850908dccd7cf50f%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638 >> 611183825162935%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC >> JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata= >> pI%2BxICsuyLzi2qAED5IEApoFPitE7yfhBVVdCZG9rao%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Section 2 defines the following terms that don't appear elsewhere in the >> document: asynchronous communication, synchronous communication. > [stf] Indeed, we use asynchronous in combination with different other terms. > So it would be best to just leave the terms asynchronous and synchronous in > the terminology section to allow combination. We utilize both terms in the > document.
Can you show us an instance of where “asynchronous communication” or “synchronous communication” is used in the document outside of terminology section? Thanks. Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
