On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 1:49 PM Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [stf] Indeed, we use asynchronous in combination with different other > terms. So it would be best to just leave the terms asynchronous and > synchronous in the terminology section to allow combination. We utilize > both terms in the document. > > > Can you show us an instance of where “asynchronous communication” or > “synchronous communication” is used in the document outside of terminology > section? > It's not, but he's saying they use "asynchronous" and "synchronous" (which is true) so they'll just define those terms. Indeed I found "asynchronous" tied to "transfer", "channel", and "interaction", for example, so I think his plan is sound. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
