Try adding a creates: clause on the unarchive task, that might do what you want.
On 27 January 2016 at 23:18, Tuomas-Matti Soikkeli <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any reasoning behind the fact that unarchive module using zip never > checks the destination if the files already exists. This is quite > inconvenient when extracting very large files. > > I understand that tar has --diff argument and it makes it easy to use, but > It could be fairly trivial to implement this with python zipfile. It is > already in in use in unarchive.py: > > https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/blob/devel/files/unarchive.py > > We could use ZipFile.infolist() to get filenames and file sizes and check > them against destination. There's already a method which decides that zip > files are always not unarchived: > > > def is_unarchived(self, mode, owner, group): > return dict(unarchived=False) > > > I could definitely contribute if this sounds plausible. > > - t-m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ansible Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/283e3ddc-d1a6-4885-a218-61b62fbf9e00%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAK5eLPRPYBzMtkG2JvaJ%3D4Qit6Gxn9n6yRo2jHLST2sFHOk_cA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
