On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:50:34 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >Hi, > >Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. > >At 08:39 23/3/01 -0800, David Rees wrote: >>Attached is my second cut at the culler functionality I mentioned >>last week. It doesn't include HTML docs yet because I think text will >>be easier to discuss. If you agree to the submission I can submit the >>docs pretty quickly. >> >>As before, my thoughts for how this "should" be done in Ant2 will be >>in different post (later). > >I just had a look at it and were wondering if you would consider waiting >for ant2.0 to roll around. The reason is that I am reluctent to add >anything new to ant1.x that we are not keeping in ant2. It is going to be >hard enough for our users without this. What do you think ? >
I had hoped that they would end up in Ant2 as well ;). The definition of Culler is basic enough that I think it will survive pretty easily. I am not really waiting on it for anything however. Actually, what is the time frame for Ant2? d
