Maby a misunderstanding here.. I'm not doubting that there should be an attrib task.. I was refering to Mathew's question : (at least my interpration of it ) is it tested on a linux (or other non windows box) and does it actually skip the task?
Sorry for the misunderstanding. Mvgr, Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: J�r�me Lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Reminder: [SUBMIT] Attr, a chmod equivalent for Windows > > > Mathew you're right. I didn't specify in which way they were equivalent. > > Correction: > > > It calls the Windows 'Attrib' program equivalent to 'chmod' on Unix. > > equivalent regarding the goal (change the permissions) but not in > functionality (because available permissions are different depending on > OSes). > > Attrib is OS dependent, so is Chmod, isn't it? > > Most of the required functionality is the read/write-ability. It is > sometimes necessary to change it. > We don't have it on Windows, we have it on Linux/Unix. > Why not have the counterpart? > > Jerome > >
