On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 12:34, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> Well, datatype instances are not properties (at least not in ANT1). 

Ant1 does not do a lot of things. 

We voted to unify in ANt2 them last round...

> Yes you
> can say that in ANT2 they will be. I could also say that <target>
> declarations can be processed by an ANT task (a quite simple thing to do).

However if you recall last round we -1'ed the idea of having targets as 
tasks...

> > Success of a language depends on a number of factors; expressability,
> > simplicity and verbosity being key players. And it is also relatively
> > domain/user specific. Compare perl programmers and VB programmers and
> > java programmers. Each language has different strengths and weaknesses
> > and tend to draw different sorts of peeps. We should be catering for the
> > java style mentality (ie focus on simplicity and verbostiy) because thats
> > our main audience.
>
> Orthogonality is one of the mayor design features of succesful languages.

not really. It is a side effect from other decisions. It is rare that an 
aspect is independent of other aspects and when making design decisions it is 
often the case that a set of related aspects for a higher order "aspect" that 
is othogonal to other higher order "aspect"s in system but the component 
aspects are rarely othogonal to each other except in exceptional 
circumstances.

> In the particular case of Java which is our taget audience, most features
> of the language are expresses in the language itself. They do not use some
> secret API not available to user defined code. The String, Class, IO
> libraries, etc. Are written in Java and use just the same stuff available
> to user code. To define features that are not expressible or usable on user
> difine code is to

so you are advocating we don't have any task at top level and instead require 
an init style target ? 

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

The big mistake that men make is that when they turn thirteen or fourteen and
all of a sudden they've reached puberty, they believe that they like women.
Actually, you're just horny. It doesn't mean you like women any more at
twenty-one than you did at ten.                --Jules Feiffer (cartoonist)

Reply via email to