On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:36, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> > The simple fact of the matter is that you have yet to show a reasonable
> > use case for having a Declarable interface. In the future we only really
> > need to keep property outside unless we allow all tasks or none. Thus
> > Declarable is what is known as flexability syndrome.
>
> The simple fact is that I have give you several examples including their
> implementations of tasks that either were hardcoded before or you plan to
> hardcode in the future (under the pretenses that they are not really
> tasks). It seems to me that you think you know all and every way ANT will
> or should be used and do not want anyone to deviate from your tight
> control.
Do you always get nasty when you are asked to support your opinion with
facts? Trying to convince people by insulting them is not likely to produce
results. Cold hard logic seems to work though. As soon as you come up with a
reasonable explanation of why we would need such a construct then it is
likely to be seriously considered.
--
Cheers,
Pete
------------------------------------------------
"No. Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try."
-- Yoda
------------------------------------------------
