On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:42, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Declaring TaskContexts (whatever that will be), declaring and >> attaching build listeners from within a build file, ... > > those examples work.
So would you still prefer hardcoded names in the build file parser? > Fine grain services allow tasks to do more interesting stuff but > also could be a maintanence nightmare and overly constraining as we > evolve. Large interfaces can be inflexible. Let's examine what the container needs to provide from our current knowledge and not stretch that too far. Combined with a note that the API for "privileged" tasks could be changed even in minor releases, this should work. Back to the original subject - would we allow such "privileged" tasks to live at the same level as targets and how would we identify them? Stefan
