> -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 7 January 2002 10:31 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: IntrospectionHelper request > > > > > > Where we have numerous patterns for things like > > > > addX > > createX > > addConfiguredX > > setX > > > > we could have probably gotten away with just > > > > addX > > setX > > > > or even just > > > > setX > > > > Good idea (for Ant 2, at least). The current distinction between > attributes and elements on the task interface is kinda artifical.
Adam, Have you considered the difference between createX and addX. This is not about attribute/elements. It is about who knows how to create an object. If we just have setX, then the implication is that all nested element objects are created by the core and not by the task. Are you suggesting that the ability for a task to create its nested elements should be removed? Conor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
