On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:04, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > I still don't get it. :/
> >
> > Well I will put it in clearer terms. I think the way you are doing it
>
> sucks
>
> > ;) The way you should do it I have already described.
>
> You mean the way you should do it for Ant2, right?
mostly
> Is there another way to accomplish the same effect in Ant1.x that you could
> descibe and approve of?
Well I have already described one method. I haven't really thought about
other mechanisms to do it - whats the problem of backporting that style
architecture into Ant1?
--
Cheers,
Pete
----------------------------------
"Don't play dumb with me.
I happen to be an expert at that"
- Maxwell Smart
----------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
