--- Christoph Wilhelms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I think it would be good for the general acceptance of Ant2,
> if - at least - many of the buildfiles/tasks used in that buildfile will
> still work with Ant2 without modifing the xmls.

Personally, I think it'd be far better to focus on making Ant2 as good as
it can possibly be and not worry about how backward-compatible with Ant1
it is. I actually thought that was the main idea -- that it was going to
be a whole new design (which is why it was being called Ant2, instead of
Ant1.x).

Diane

=====
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to