Costin wrote: > > I'm not an active ant commiter curently, but if my vote still counts > it'll be -1 on any candidate that doesn't have a clear backward > compatibility plan built into the design - i.e it should be able to run > most existing ant tasks and provide wrappers between the new APIs and > the old ones ( like xalan compat package for example ).
I do experimental gump runs with JDK 1.4 and Xerces 2 substituted for their prior versions. If any proposed success to Ant would like to see how well they fair against the current set of projects, let me know and I will be glad to set it up. My guess is that a proposal with a cleaner design and a fair measure of backwards compatibility would be a slam dunk. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
