From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > did not vote directly and of those that did, while we have some support > for the cutoff date, (+3.5) votes, there is insufficient support, (+2.5, > -1) votes for the selection method. Agreeing on a date but not agreeing > on what to do at that date is not that useful :-)
Exactly, I abstained coz I wasn't ready for the cutoff date, but I agree with the selection method - that by majority. > Any suggestions would be welcome. What would really help me cast my vote is a requirement to implementation mapping summary for the two proposals. In other words, I would like to be able to see what requested features (core ones, at least) have been implemented by each proposal. If both proposals have implemented a specific requested feature in different ways, then we have to discuss the implementations on their merits. If each proposal has been addressing different requested features, then we need to find a way for them to co-exist such that we end up with a better addressal of the requested features. So, what I would say, in summary is, postpone the cutoff date by a month or so and start campaigning meanwhile ;-) > > Conor > Cheers, Magesh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
