--- Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > +1 for myrmidon as the foundation - its developer > base gives me confidence that we will get where we > want to. > > Bear in mind that the +1 is not based on the > technical differences between Mutant and Myrmidon - > I am sure both these proposals don't lack in > design... >
I feel quite unconfortable on just picking one of this codebases. The truth of the matter is that I think that except for the people involved, very few have followed the development of that codebase and hence we are not aware of the consequences of the decisions being made. There has been very little discussion in the wider audience on why things are the way they are in there. Given ANTs history, we will get stuck (due to backward compatibility) with such code base even without knowing what we are commiting to. Before we go picking something I would like to see a written report of the design feature, and consequences of those features that we can all read and have an idea where are we getting into. That applies to both revolution proposals. Jose Alberto __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
