----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Beside Costin, I don't remember anyone saying he/she wouldn't want to
> consider switching code base entirely (but among the sea of posts, I could
> have missed them of course). Most committers admit they haven't even had
> time to look in depth at either proposals (now single proposal). Some said
> they don't believe in starting from scratch, but seeing is believing, so
let
> us start by looking at the remaining proposal... The heightened scrutiny
> will undoubtedly show its strengths and weaknesses (and whether it's
> over-engineered as some proclaimed). Then decide which route is better,
i.e.
> evolve Ant 1.x or Myrmidon into Ant2.

> And after all, people who worked on the proposals are not complete
whackos,
> but most likely very talented coders, and well aware of the Ant 1.x code
> base. I think their hard work deserves it. --DD

>From your comments above, it is crystal clear among other things that the
hard work of Conor does not even deserve to take a look at...even the ideas.
Thank you. That's great.

Stephane






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to