On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > though of course gump runs off CVS-head which may be an issue.
Not on my machine 8-) Apart from publishing the result (I don't like passphrase less keys) I could automate running Gump. > What do I want to see in terms of task evolution: Nothing that would require using a different code-base as far as I can tell. Many of these things are even simple enough to include them in a 1.5.x release. > Underneath all that, I want so say that maybe it is time to move to > java1.2 and clean up all our classpath stuff, so that we can move to > a good packaged world, get rid of so much classpath confusion, > etc. Which means that we move to something called ant2.0 No problem with getting closer to that. Given what we've promised to people out there, I think we really need to increase the major version number if we switch to JDK 1.2. > Compatibility is always the issue. With a 2.0 number we can get away > with incompatilbities that are obvious and easy to fix, but we > should still avoid any subtle incompatibilties that only take time > to show up, as users wont catch them. +1 in general, but I'm not sure how we want to achieve that. The change in <ant>'s property overriding mechanism that has broken the Avalon builds hasn't been caught by Gump and ant-dev agreed the old behavior was wrong (a real bug, not only slightly incorrect), but yet we didn't see that people relied on them. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
