On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> In the case of <antcall> I pretty much doubt it would be too useful >> as you could always add the if/unless attributes to the target you >> intend to call. > > No, you can't really do that because if/unless tests for a > properties existence. How would you *not* pass a property using > <param>?
inheritall="false" > I see <antcall> allowing me to write certain repetitive tasks > once-and-only-once. IMHO writing a task to perform the "certain repetitive tasks" would be better than using <antcall>. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
