We are on the same page here, I just didn't express myself well enough it seems. I love the extension points in Ant, and I'm using them. The point is of course that the extension points other than tasks/types are not handled in a consistent manner, and are very limited (case in point being described in more details at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14834). I would hope that <antlib> would eventually allow defining easily all those extension points (not just tasks/types).
That Nicola Ken says your [embed] proposal works great is very good news, and I'm also very happy to hear Magesh is talking about a solution for the consistent extension point handling. This is all going in the right direction. Thanks, --DD -----Original Message----- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PATCH] adds 'if'/'unless' to <antcall> (CallTarget.java) Regarding "extension points" - I think we do need more, not less. I agree it would be better to have a more consistent mechanism and definition and docs. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
