On 12/20/00 11:57 AM, "Curtis White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with this idea. To the end user, it shouldn't
> really matter which SCM product you are using. The
> external interface should be the same.
>
> But that brings up the question on what to do about
> functionality specific to each SCM?
The way this is typically handled is via String properties or some such.
This is useful when the differences are small, but if there are too many, it
suffers from usability problems.
I think a good analysis would have to be done to see if there are too many
differences or not.
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
- Thinking about Source Control Day, Jem BGI WAC
- Re: Thinking about Source Control Conor MacNeill
- Re: Thinking about Source Control Nico Seessle
- Re: Thinking about Source Control James Duncan Davidson
- Re: Thinking about Source Control Curtis White
- Re: Thinking about Source Control James Duncan Davidson
- Re: Thinking about Source Control David Corbin
- RE: Thinking about Source Control Chris Platner
- RE: Thinking about Source Control Douglas Melzer
- Re: Thinking about Source Control David Corbin
- RE: Thinking about Source Control Curtis White
- RE: Thinking about Source Control Scott Ganyo
- Re: Thinking about Source Control David Corbin
- Re: Thinking about Source Control Curtis White
- RE: Thinking about Source Control Les Hughes
- Re: Thinking about Source Control David Corbin
